Your session has been flagged for unusual activity.
Please confirm you're human to continue.
Summarise the bundle, draft the memo, and catch the citation that does not exist.
No credit card · all four major AI models in one place
Paralegal work is volume: documents to read, chronologies to build, memos to draft, citations to check. AI takes the first pass off your desk entirely.
It is also the single worst-behaved tool in law for invented case citations. That is not a reason to avoid it — it is a reason to never let a citation through without a check that attaches a source.
Dates, events and the document each one came from.
Try this prompt
The admissions, the contradictions, the quotable lines.
Try this prompt
A first draft with the structure a supervising attorney expects.
Try this prompt
Whether it says what they claim it says.
Try this prompt
Claude for long documents and memo drafting, a second model to verify every authority
Claude handles long bundles and writes the cleanest first-draft memo. But no single model should be trusted on citations — running a separate verification pass is what turns a usable draft into one you can hand upstairs.
Use it inside MultipleChatYes, and lawyers have been sanctioned for filing the results. Ask it to mark propositions with [CITE] instead of producing authority, then verify every reference. The fact check flags what it cannot locate.
On paid plans nothing you upload trains a model and providers do not retain it. Follow your firm's own rules on client confidentiality first — they take precedence over any vendor assurance.
It replaces the first pass, not the judgement. The paralegals doing well with it are handling more matters, not fewer.
Open MultipleChat and turn on AI Collaboration.
Upload the bundle or paste the transcript.
Ask for the chronology or summary with source references, not conclusions.
Verify every single citation before anything leaves your desk.
Yes, including scanned documents. Ask for page references so every claim can be traced back.
It is reliable for framing, structure and first drafts. It is not reliable on authority. That distinction is the whole job.
It can draft a structure and language for review. Filing anything it produced without verification is how people end up in the news.
Tell it to mark [CITE] rather than generate references, then let the verification pass find sources for each one. Anything it cannot support is flagged.
MultipleChat gives paralegals access to ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Grok — one login, one bill, side-by-side.
Open MultipleChatAlso see: Free AI tools · AI glossary · AI for other professions
Continue learning
See the AI subscription that replaces separate ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Grok accounts.
Multi-model AIRun the same prompt through ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Grok before trusting one answer.
GuideChoose the best model for writing, research, coding, documents, images and business work.
AlternativeUse ChatGPT alternatives together: Claude, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity, files, web search and creation tools.
Best alternativeSee why the best ChatGPT alternative is not one model, but all major AI models in one workspace.
One appUse the major AI models in one workspace for comparison, files and AI Collaboration.
Buyer questionCompare ChatGPT and Claude side by side or let one model review the other.
Buyer intentOne app for several frontier AI models, side-by-side comparison and model collaboration.
PlatformA professional workspace for using several AI models, comparing answers and creating deliverables.
Core conceptUse several frontier models together for stronger answers and fewer blind spots.
ComparisonCompare several AI answers side by side when the output matters.
WorkflowBuild a professional AI stack for documents, research, writing, images and automation.
Free toolsStart with free tools, then upgrade when multi-model workflows save real time.
