🛡️
Session Flagged

Your session has been flagged for unusual activity.

You can try our app by searching for MultipleChat AI on Google and clicking the multiplechat.ai link to try it free.
Quick verification

Please confirm you're human to continue.


← All customer stories
Research Workflow example

Committee prep became more balanced and easier to review.

JP
Jonathan Price
Research Administrator · Meridian Policy Institute - 42 people · Cambridge, MA, USA
6
briefs prepared for one committee cycle

The before

Jonathan prepared dense background packs for grant and policy committees. He could use AI to summarize, but one model often emphasized one interpretation too strongly.

The turning point

With MultipleChat, he runs the same prompt across models, then asks an AI-Team to identify what each answer overstates or ignores. The output becomes a balanced draft instead of a single-model viewpoint.

"The side-by-side view keeps one model from setting the whole frame."

— Jonathan Price, Research Administrator

The after

Committee members now receive shorter briefs with clearer caveats. Jonathan still validates sources, but the first synthesis is more useful.

What they used

Side-by-side compare

Review multiple summaries before drafting.

AI-Team critique

Identify overstatements and missing caveats.

Executive brief

Turn research into a readable committee memo.

Committee briefs Research synthesis Model comparison

Could this be your workflow?

Compare models, build AI-Teams, and improve drafts before the human review.

Get started

More stories

Continue learning

See paid plans